Harare is growing. So why is building the right thing so hard?
There are sites in Borrowdale that I think about more than
most listings I've worked with. Large stands. Established addresses. Some
carry dual zoning for residential and commercial, offering something
genuinely rare in this city: optionality. A developer could build luxury
cluster homes and respond to the hunger for a secure, high-end residential
product in the northern suburbs. They could go commercial, tap into the
corridor of business activity that Borrowdale Road has quietly become. Or, if
they are bold enough and patient enough, they could do both.
On paper, these are exactly the kinds of opportunities that
should attract serious development money immediately.
And yet.
The city has a plan. It just hasn't caught up with
itself.
The Harare Master Plan 2025–2045, prepared by DSA Consortium
and formally adopted by City Council in July 2025, is the most comprehensive
urban blueprint this city has produced in thirty years. It replaces a framework
from 1993 that had, by the council's own admission, become largely defunct. The
plan covers 960.8 km² of the capital and sets the direction for the next two
decades of growth. For anyone building, buying, or selling property in Harare,
it is not a government document to file away. It is a statement of intent.
The plan's central message is this: Harare will grow up, not
out. It adopts a containment and densification strategy as its primary housing
model, with limited outward expansion reserved for defined corridors only. The
numbers behind this decision are stark. Harare's population currently stands at
approximately 1.85 million. By 2035, experts project it could reach 5.7
million. Zimbabwe's national housing backlog already exceeds one million
households. A city that may nearly triple in population within a decade cannot
be managed by a plan drawn up when many of its current residents hadn't yet
been born.
So the vision is right. The direction is right. The land —
and the need — both exist. And still, the developer's nightmare persists.
The planning environment makes execution difficult.
Zoning in Harare is not a simple thing to navigate.
Dual-zoned sites carry history — permits granted, built upon, allowed to lapse.
Legal processes that take years to resolve. Sites that eventually come back to
market clean but carry stories that make cautious investors nervous, even when
the facts fully support moving forward.
The Master Plan is meant to address exactly this kind of
friction. It aims to eliminate conflicting developments and bring order to a
city that has grown without coherent direction for three decades. In practice,
however, the gap between policy intent and implementation remains the terrain
developers must navigate.
Consider a single data point: in 2024, more than 25% of development
applications in Harare were rejected for zoning violations. One in four. That
does not suggest a city where developers can move confidently and quickly; it
suggests a planning environment where the rules exist but are inconsistently
understood, applied, and — until this plan — communicated.
The Master Plan's low-density residential zone, covering
suburbs like Borrowdale, Mt Pleasant, Highlands, and Greendale, is directed to
protect its character while allowing selective densification through clustering
and subdivision. That is a reasonable policy position. But its implementation
depends on council capacity, permit processing times, and local scheme
alignment — none of which the Master Plan fully resolves. A developer who has
done everything right can still find themselves waiting far longer than they
should for a decision that determines whether a project lives or dies.
Comments
Post a Comment